Invitation: Be Informed and Sign Up.

Human Right

What is the primary emphasis needed for informing Americans
in a way that will best help us achieve improved Medicare for All?

— Fully understand "human rights principles" that are associated with health care
    ... and demand our rights related to those principles
    ... and expect a law to provide those rights.

... or ...

— Fully understand what incredible results improved Medicare for All can provide
    ... and tell politicians and candidates we want those specific results
    ... and make certain they provide a good law that provides those results.

Answer: the latter!

Do we want "Human Right" on most of our signs or "Medicare for All"?

Answer: the latter!

We need as many millions of Americans as possible (out of our population of over 230 million adults) to be informed ... and, as a result, know WHY we want and need improved Medicare for All: the incredible results of efficiency. We need to have Americans informing themselves and each other in very small groups so that Americans collectively have the following general knowledge**:
— Health-care-for-all makes good common sense.**
— Health-care-for-all efficiency gets incredible results.**
— Due to the incredible results that we will have for ourselves and our country, improved Medicare for All via single-payer health care is the patriotic position to take when it comes to the subject of health care.

** General knowledge that is backed up by the information that is provided at the bottomline web page (What Americans Should Know) ... about which they were informed in small groups and had an opportunity to hear and be heard about that information.

READ A SUMMARY BELOW

... which includes a special contribution (Statement #1)
from a mid-west single-payer activist RN

No matter what you call getting health-care-for-all
established in the United States,
we suggest This …

#1 Health care for all fellow human beings is the RIGHT thing to do, no matter your moral and/or spiritual beliefs, and Improved Medicare for All via single payer health care is the most fiscally conservative way to achieve it, no matter your political affiliation.

Why does "most fiscally conservative" mean?

"Discussion" about that ...

It means that we will cut the nation's health care costs by hundreds of billions of dollars per year (literally: an estimated $400 billion every year) and still have private family physicians' practices and community health centers as options for people (everyone) to get health care.

How will will we be able to cut so much in health care costs? By establishing efficiency in how we pay for health care and experiencing the incredibly positive results that have already been demonstrated by other free-market countries for decades.

Do we need to spend time studying the health-care-for-all systems of those other countries? No, because most other health-care-for-all systems are more complex than the proposed improved Medicare for All with one health care plan and one public agency payer.

#2 Until Americans, the general public,

— know what the subject is and are informed enough to
                    be comfortable about this big change to our society
                    that they look forward to it and embrace the idea

— and communicate to the U.S. Congress from all across the country
                    with a total number of over a million (meaning that over 10 million
                    need to sign up at this Medicare for All website)

… then it does not matter how we frame it.

Therefore, …
… when you know what the subject is,
then sign up to communicate.

Discussion

If an apartment caught on fire, it’s best that the fire department come to save that apartment and the entire apartment building.

Unlike the example of a residence on fire, health care situations are potentially critical for everyone, even more than some other social services. When there is a contagious disease, it is best to be already set up to help the entire population.

When a country is being hurt economically, such as the U.S. is from decades of business/job cut-backs and now the dramatic negative impact of medical tourism, then everyone suffers; providing health care becomes a contributor to being economically competitive. Whether one calls all of this a human right or a common good, it simply makes common sense.

Finally, if even one person in our group or our society has unnecessary pain and suffering, shouldn’t we take action? Is that called a “human right” for that person in our group or simply caring for them as a member of our group?

Additional Information

If One American Hurts … and Tens of Millions of Americans are Hurting.

United Nations and Human Rights.

The best health-care-for-all (will be ours!).

The Campaign Status

Human Right

READ A SUMMARY BELOW

#1 Health care for all fellow human beings is the RIGHT thing to do, no matter your moral and/or spiritual beliefs, and Improved Medicare for All via single payer health care is the most fiscally conservative way to achieve it, no matter your political affiliation.

#2 Until Americans, the general public,

… then it does not matter how we frame it.

Therefore, …
… when you know what the subject is,
then sign up to communicate.

Invitation:

Know What Americans Should Know

and then

Sign Up to Stand Up for Single-Payer.

Bookmark with:

The Campaign Status

Human Right

READ A SUMMARY BELOW

#1 Health care for all fellow human beings is the RIGHT thing to do, no matter your moral and/or spiritual beliefs, and Improved Medicare for All via single payer health care is the most fiscally conservative way to achieve it, no matter your political affiliation.

#2 Until Americans, the general public,

… then it does not matter how we frame it.

Therefore, …… when you know what the subject is,then sign up to communicate.

Invitation:

Know What Americans Should Know

and then

Sign Up to Stand Up for Single-Payer.

Bookmark with:

Therefore, …
… when you know what the subject is,
then sign up to communicate.